Did a Defective Product Cause My Injury? McNeal v. Smith & Wesson Corp.

By: Admin

Defective Product

You earn money in order to purchase goods that, you assume, are safe to use. Few of us would have a second thought about buying a children’s toy, for instance, and giving the child that toy before ensuring that it is not a defective product. It is simply a symptom of the world that we are fortunate to live in. After all, it is rare that 1) the products we buy are defective and 2) they are faulty enough to potentially cause harm.

Though rare, it is important to realize that defective products do exist and do cause harm all across the country–sometimes leading to catastrophic, even fatal, injuries. For Randy McNeal, a trip to the shooting range could have easily ended fatally, but instead, resulted in the amputation of his left small finger (pinky). Though certainly no injury to scoff at, it is easy to see how lucky he truly was after reviewing the specifics of the accident.

Under Fire: Who is at Fault?

According to the case notes, McNeal was visiting On Target Guns and Indoor Range with a friend. Wanting to allow his friend to handle the weapon safely within the retail section of the gun range, he released the magazine from the pistol and attempted to pull back the slide and put it in the locked position to check for a chambered round.

The slide, however, did not seem to be able to be pulled back far enough to be placed in the locked position. McNeal then decided to try to quickly pull back the slide multiple times, and that is when misfortune struck.

The Smith & Wesson pistol fell from his hands. He managed to grab it before it fell to the ground but accidentally discharged the weapon, causing the injury and amputation of his finger.

As it turns out, the issue that McNeal experienced, he claimed, was caused by a loose screw associated with the pistol’s built-in laser sight, which blocked the slide from being placed in the locked position. McNeal also claimed that this was no issue with the maintenance of his weapon, but rather, the clear signs of a dangerously defective product.

McNeal’s injury resulted in pain and suffering, permanent physical and psychological impairment, high medical expenses and the loss of enjoyment of certain social, recreational and work activities, as well as lost wages and future lost wages. McNeal’s wife also claimed loss of consortium, companionship and society with her husband due to this serious injury. All of this, McNeal asserted, was the responsibility of Smith & Wesson. After all, the gun manufacturer went on to redesign the model with modified laser sights, even going as far as retrofitting the original design upon request. This is a clear-cut case of a defective product causing significant bodily injury, no?

Injury from Product ≠ Defective Product

McNeal was seriously injured by a Smith & Wesson product, which did not perform as it was manufactured to, leading to his injury. However, injury alone does not prove that the manufacturer produced a defective product. Smith & Wesson, or any manufacturer, is never asked to create a product that is accident proof. Instead, it is up to McNeal to prove that the specific defect he found in the product directly caused his injury.

It is a small distinction, but an important one. In attempting to hold Smith & Wesson liable for his injury, he was also required to prove proximate cause (logical consideration of case based on precedence, justice, etc.) and cause in fact (the direct cause and effect of the defect and injury that it allegedly caused).

Though the loose screw may have very well have triggered the events that led to McNeal’s injury, he failed to connect the loose screw to the pistol slipping from his hands–the real cause of the gun discharging.

Defective product litigation, as you can see, can be quite complicated. Even though you can logically understand McNeal’s claim against Smith & Wesson, the personal injury law, especially surrounding a defective product, can be frustratingly unintuitive for those who do not live and breathe it every day.

If you are injured due to a dangerously defective product, do not hesitate; call our product liability attorneys today.

Information cited from: https://casetext.com/case/mcneal-v-smith-wesson-corp

Testimonials

I hired Al a few years ago for a workers compensation case. From the very beginning I found Al to be very knowledgeable and professional. He made sure I was aware of everything that was happening with my case from start to finish. His assistant (Melody) is also very professional and knowledgeable. I have and will continue to recommend friends and family members as I feel Al is one of the best attorneys in Florida and has exceeded my expectations.

– Debra

I was looking for an Orlando Workers’ Comp attorney to represent me in a workers compensation case and Al Hilado was recommended by a family member. Mr. Hilado is very professional and knowledgeable in this area of law. Mr. Hilado explained everything to me and would not end a meeting until he felt I understood what was happening or had happened. I was very happy with the way he handled my case. He explained everything to me and did not try to push me in any direction as far as when I had to make decisions. Whenever I had a question, Al was a phone call away. He returned my calls and emails very quickly. His staff is extremely professional and friendly. I highly recommend Al Hilado to anyone who is injured at work and needs workers’ comp assistance.

– Karen